|
|
|
|
|
Several
pages require Adobe Acrobat to view. If not already
installed on your computer please download by
clicking on the Acrobat Reader icon.

[INTRODUCTION]
[FUNDAMENTAL
BELIEFS] [GOALS]
[STRUCTURES]
|
|
Introduction
Our Professional Development School Partnership
(PDS) is defined by an orientation to the nature
of the collaboration between schools and universities
-- valuing and acknowledging the unique talents,
strengths, questions, and concerns that individuals
and/or parties bring to the process. The purpose
of this PDS charter is to provide our Partnership
with a framework that articulates our vision,
and delineates institutional and individual responsibility
and accountability. This charter is fluid and
subject to reflection and revision because it
is intended to be responsive to the growing, evolving
nature of our collaboration. It will support the
work of current participants and lay the groundwork
for our future work.
|
|
Fundamental
Beliefs
Central to
our work is a fundamental concern for students’
learning, growth and development. We believe that
all children can learn and that children—and the
teaching of those children—are valuable and worthy
of full commitment on the part of teachers, teacher
educators, and administrators. We are committed
to promoting urban schools and universities as
inclusive communities of life-long learners. Our
work is supported and defined by the following
four cornerstones:
| 1- |
Shared
responsibility for the development of pre-service
and beginning teachers |
| 2- |
The
continuing development of experienced teachers
and teacher educators |
| 3- |
The
creation of communities of sustained inquiry |
| 4- |
The
research and development of the teaching profession
and school reform |
Cornerstones
Beliefs:
Each column of the graphic below represents a
cornerstone . The cornerstones are supported by
a foundation of equity and uphold our efforts
to improve the educational opportunities and experiences
of all children.
|
CHILDREN'S
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
|
|
I
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
EQUITY
|
The
conception and interpretation of roles within
this Partnership is creative and flexible. We
want to foster a diverse community that provides
opportunities for each individual to move thoughtfully
between the various roles played out within schools
and universities. The roles that we play in PDS
are not determined by the positions we hold within
our institutions. Rather, these roles value and
acknowledge the unique talents, strengths, questions,
and concerns that individuals bring to the process.
These roles reflect the ideal that PDS are agents
of change. For example, with the exception of
roles designed to create continuity, as outlined
in the "Structures" section, most roles
have been designed with the kind of flexibility
required to foster the strengths, interests and
needs of individual participants and partner sites.
PDS will support people in developing and applying
their talents and strengths. We see our Partnership
as a space where all people come to learn, but
also as a space where all people come to teach.
The value of the contributions is attached to
the person and what s/he brings and not to the
institutional position. The flow of collaboration
is between schools and universities, and between
and among schools.
We
are committed to building a common culture and
shared respect between schools and universities.
Clear advantages of such a synthesis include a
common language across issues of teaching and
learning, and value for the diverse kinds of understandings
and perspectives different people bring to the
Partnership.
Our
Partnership will be pro-active in building a common
culture and shared respect with the local communities
to include the voices, concerns, and strengths
of families and neighborhood leaders.
Our
PDS is based upon the belief that we must work
toward an intellectual and compassionate community
that is sensitive to issues of equity in urban
education. All of our work is sensitive to race,
gender, and class, sexual orientation, disability,
and religion.
We
understand that in order for our work to be valued,
we must be both self-reflective and accountable
to the members of the Partnership Community.
|
|
GOALS
Our
goals described below address the cornerstones
outlined in the "Fundamental Beliefs"
section. In implementing these goals, each site
needs flexibility to be different to develop along
the continuum of needs of each student, faculty,
and administrator. These goals closely reflect
the goals for PDS outlined by National Council
for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)
in recognition of the relationship between our
PDS and the national PDS community.
Goal
1: Learning community
We believe our PDS should foster
learning centered communities that support children
and adults’ learning. Opportunities to learn are
equitably supported.
Goal
2: Collaboration and correspondence of responsibility
Our PDS is characterized by joint
work between schools and among school and university
faculty and administrators directed at implementing
our fundamental beliefs. Responsibility for learning
is shared; research is jointly defined and implemented;
all participants share expertise in order to support
children’s and adults’ learning.
Goal
3: Accountability
Our PDS is accountable to the students
in all of our education settings. PDS should be
responsible to the parents, the wider community,
and the teaching and teacher education professions
for upholding high standards for the teaching
and learning of all students, the preparation
of new teachers, and the creation of communities
of sustained inquiry and growth. We will weave
multiple assessment structures throughout all
the work that we do.
Goal
4: Equity
Our PDS views equity in three ways.
First, we believe that all children should have
equal access to high quality education. Second,
we believe that we should work towards norms and
practices which support the diverse strengths,
values, and experiences brought to the Partnership
by all involved. We want to make sure that we
are focusing on opportunities for all members
of partner sites to have access to the work done
at all partner sites. Finally, we believe it is
important to create both consistent and flexible
structures that will enable us to examine and
push forward issues of equity in substantive as
well as symbolic ways.
Institutional
Commitments
Teachers
College Teacher Education Programs and District
3 value, promote, and encourage our work at every
opportunity. The PDS provides multiple opportunities
for participants to develop their knowledge, skills
and understandings related to working with diverse
students in urban settings. Below we present a
table that describes corresponding responsibilities
and commitments by the university and schools.
|
Teachers
College
|
School
Partners
|
|
Value
PDS activities/responsibilities as an integral
part of the tenure and promotion process
for faculty and administrators.
|
Value
PDS activities as an integral part of the
teaching
and learning process for faculty and administrators
at PDS sites.
|
|
Restructure
faculty and staff load:
For
example, define workload to include PDS
work.
|
Restructure
faculty load:
Provide
teachers with PDS responsibilities with
release time to conduct these efforts.
|
|
PDS
experience and interest in PDS involvement
used as a criteria in all teacher education
faculty searches.
|
Recruit
PDS graduates for urban public schools.
Give PDS graduates first priority for job
interviews.
|
|
Provide
pooled credits within PDS sites (following
established guidelines with an annual review)
|
Prepare
for the effective mentoring of future teachers.
|
|
Create
new teaching positions for PDS school-based
teachers at the university: incorporate
accomplished teachers into faculty positions,
such as clinical faculty, so that university
students may also learn from the expertise
of our PDS school based teachers.
|
Create
a variety of roles and opportunities for
PDS university-based teachers at the schools;
Integrate
university faculty into school forums such
as faculty conferences and school leadership
meetings.
|
|
Develop
opportunities to engage all members of the
university in the Partnership at different
points in their careers.
|
Develop
opportunities to engage all members of the
schools in the Partnership at different
points in their careers.
|
|
Involve
the wider TC community in our work.
|
Create
new and multiple methods for our work to
impact schools across District 3 in positive
and productive ways.
|
|
Support
field-based research and inquiry in PDS
partners and consider these activities in
making personnel decisions.
|
Support
field-based research and inquiry in PDS.
(Research engaged in at PDSP sites directly
impacts the practice of the participants
and the lives of children.)
|
|
Support
the aggregate placement of student teachers
and interns. Participating education departments
at TC will give priority to placing student
teachers first in PDS collaborating schools
where appropriate placements exist. Appropriate
placements will be defined by the pre-service
program and by the individual schools. When
possible, student teachers will be aggregated
in such a way that a critical mass is achieved
and supervision can be done by school-based
personnel. Creative methods for supporting
this model will be explored.
|
Support
the aggregate placement of student teachers
and interns by working to have multiple
appropriate placements at each site.
Develop
opportunities for student teachers to work
with a cohort of teachers.
Develop
opportunities for school-based educators
to supervise student teachers.
|
|
Provide
opportunities to disseminate ideas and research
findings such as teacher education cross-departmental
seminars, cross-school conversations. We
will create several different kinds of structures
such as cross-departmental seminars that
will help disseminate knowledge generated
within PDSP sites across the Partnership.
Efforts will be made to disseminate to the
educational community through publication.
|
Provide
opportunities to disseminate ideas and research
findings such as teacher education cross-school
seminars and conversations. Create different
kinds of structures such as cross-school
seminars that will disseminate knowledge
generated within PDS sites across the Partnership.
Efforts will be made to disseminate to the
educational community through publication
and conferences.
|
|
Incorporate
New York State Standards for Teaching and
Standards for Learning into our research
and practice.
|
Incorporate
New York State Standards for Teaching and
Standards for Student Learning into our
research and practice.
|
|
Support
the office of the PDS co-directors.
|
Support
the office of the PDS co-directors.
|
|
Look
for productive and thoughtful ways to involve
families and communities in our work.
|
Look
for productive and thoughtful ways to involve
families and communities in our work.
|
|
|
Structures
General
description of structure within specific sites
Our PDS supports
both flexible and continuous (non-flexible) roles.
Continuous (non-flexible) roles are institutionally
supported positions and committees intended to
provide the kind of continuous leadership that
will allow our work to continue and grow. Flexible
roles are roles and positions that change with
changing needs. These roles are important to ensure
that there are multiple ways for people to participate.
This fluid approach to roles should translate
into various activities and levels of participation
that change over time, that are responsive to
the goals and the four cornerstones, and to the
needs of the community. It is important to continually
reflect upon and revise opportunities for participation.
Continuous
Roles & Structure
| I |
Partnership
Wide |
| |
 |
A
Co-Director (with faculty status at Teachers
College) |
| |
 |
A
Co-Director (with significant school-based
experience in the NYC Board of Education.) |
|
Responsibilities of the (co-) director(s)
include: |
| |
|
- |
interfacing
with the institutional constituencies at (1)
TC:, President, Dean, TEPC, professors, students,
alumni , admissions, development, employees;
(2) Schools: community, directors, Principals,
Superintendents, teachers, parents, development
office; (3) National/international community:
NCATE, Holmes |
| |
|
- |
budgetary
planning and management |
| |
|
- |
coordination
of PDS sites |
| |
|
- |
flow
of information and communication |
| |
|
- |
facilitating
roles of participants |
| |
|
- |
overseeing
documentation |
| |
 |
A
full time (permanent and continuous) secretary
|
| II |
School
Wide |
| |
 |
Each
individual school Partnership will be supported
by (1) a Teacher Liaison and (2) a University
Liaison. |
| |
|
- |
Each
Liaison will receive "load credit"
or compensation for this responsibility. The
amount of time is flexible, and depends upon
the work generated by the site. |
| |
|
- |
The
Principal will provide for a liaison position
at each site. |
| |
 |
The
liaisons will be responsible for: |
|
Responsibilities of the (co-) director(s)
include: |
|
facilitating
and encouraging major PDS initiatives such
as interdisciplinary team teaching, on-site
seminars, curriculum development and reflection,
student-centered pedagogical and curricular
initiatives, collaborative teaching ,reflective
practice and research
|
| |
|
- |
coordinating
future teachers/interns (supervision of internship,
co-planning of future teacher/intern experiences,
managing communication between school and
college regarding student teachers/interns)
|
| |
|
- |
providing
inquiry and teaching contacts for the utilization
of partnership participants ( e.g. facilitate
working together of various departments/programs
at college with teaching faculty) |
| |
|
- |
yearly
documentation of site-based PDS initiative |
| IV |
Greater
Council |
| |
 |
Greater
Council is open to everyone in District 3
partner schools and the Teachers College Partnership.
These meetings will be twice a year. The purpose
of these meetings will be reflecting, evaluating,
sharing and disseminating of partner site
activities. |
Flexible
Roles &
Structure
Examples
of flexible structures and their connection to PDS
cornerstones include:
|
I
|
Improving
school and university teaching and curriculum
by supporting and developing |
|
|
|
interdisciplinary
team teaching |
|
|
|
thoughful and appropriate curriculum
|
|
|
|
heterogeneous
grouping of students, teachers and faculty
|
|
|
|
creative
student-centered pedagogical and curricular
initiatives |
|
|
|
collaborative
teaching and research |
|
|
|
reflective
practice |
|
II
|
Improving
the preparation of pre-service teachers, counselors
and administrators by offering |
|
|
|
opportunities
to plan, teach and reflect in a supported
community |
|
|
|
field
based seminars |
|
|
|
intensive
practical experiences |
|
III
|
Promoting
and sustaining communities of inquiry by offering |
|
|
|
opportunities
to plan, teach and reflect in a supported
community |
|
|
|
field
based seminars |
|
|
|
intensive
practical experiences |
|
IV
|
.
Promoting school renewal and school reform
by promoting
|
|
|
|
the
integration of intern and teacher learning
with school instructional program |
|
|
|
collegiality |
|
|
|
inquiry |
|
|
|
the
dissemination of new knowledge. |
Accountability
and Documentation Practices
At
every juncture of our work, we will document and
analyze how our work (1) broadens the base of
participation, (2) impacts the pre-service programs,
and (3) impacts students’ learning. Each site
will be responsible for preparing a brief document
describing how they are being responsive to their
own context as well as the overarching goals and
cornerstones of PDS. This document will be based
on the goals set by the site-based Partnership
at the beginning of the year and reviewed at the
end of the year. Although it will be the responsibility
of the teacher and university liaison to ensure
the document is written and completed, it will
be viewed as whole site-based partnership initiative.
Thus, each document will be generated and agreed
upon by the site at large. The document will also
be submitted to the Partnership Committee. This
work will be done in accordance with (1) the Comprehensive
Education Plan of the School and District and
(2) School Leadership Teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|