Consultating Services for
International Organizations:
Building Institutional Partnerships
Drawing on recognition of the Center’s experience and
expertise in the development of the field of peace education, the TCPEC is
annually contacted for involvement in working partnerships with academic institutions,
United Nations agencies, non-governmental organizations, and civil society
groups. These consultations are an important way in which the TCPEC creates
institutional relationships as a means of strengthening a global research perspective
and in introducing peace education practices and methodologies to a wider audience.
Training of the Trainers:
The Afghan Institute of Learning
The Afghan Institute of Learning (AIL) joined the Peace Education Center in
New York for an intensive training of trainers program in the substance and
methodology of peace education. The training, which took place in the Fall
of 2005, assisted AIL for the purpose of integrating the subject into its training
of teachers and thus into the wide-spread education programs is now offers.
AIL currently conducts a broad range of education and service programs directed
toward the preparation of Afghan Women and girls for economic autonomy and
active participation in the civil society and government of Afghanistan. The
founder and director of the Institute, Sakena Yacoobi, having participated
as a plenary speaker and workshop presenter at the International Institute
on Peace Education (IIPE) recognized that peace education could meet some
of the essential needs in the programs offered to thousands of Afghan citizens
living in camps in Pakistan and in rural areas of Afghanistan. In particular,
she was interested in the training of AIL trainers in the substance, methodologies
and approaches developed by the Teachers College Peace Education Center (TCPEC).
Designing an International MA Degree
in Peace Education for the UN University for Peace
In November 2003, TCPEC Coordinator Tony Jenkins
began organizing a substantial effort to design a conceptual and guiding framework
for the UN affiliated University for Peace’s new Peace Education Masters
Degree Programme that began accepting students in the fall of 2004. This framework
serves as the foundation of the programme and guiding instructions for course
development. The TCPEC assisted the University for Peace in identifying leading
peace educators from around the world to teach and design the newly developed
courses, assessed other courses that have been developed, and designed two
comprehensive capstone courses for the programme.
“The Comprehensive Programme and Course Framework” was developed
to assure the academic programme and courses of the Masters Degree Programme
in Peace Education are fully consistent with comprehensive and holistic principals
of peace education. The Framework is built around core concepts and organizing
ideas based on the values which inform the purposes and goals of peace education.
The need for such a framework was determined at the International Consultation
for the Masters Degree Programme in Peace Education, held at Teachers College
Columbia University, November 6-10, 2002. The substance of the framework is
derived from several sources; primarily, the theoretical work of Betty Reardon
as it has been applied and developed by the TCPEC; the international field
of peace education as it has been practiced for the past three and a half decades
in various parts of the world, particularly by the members of the Peace Education
Commission of the International Peace Research Association; the International
Consultation on the University for Peace Masters Degree Programme in Peace
Education; and the preparatory documents of the UPEACE Masters Degree Programme.
The Comprehensive Programme Framework designates the concepts, skills and
capacities integral to the programme as a whole. It is based upon general principles
underpinning comprehensive peace education, and provides an overview of their
multiple dimensions. This provides a rationale for the values, themes, pedagogies,
and structures of the various courses. The framework is also holistically developed:
each of the basic principles given specific attention is interrelated to form
a holistic conceptual foundation for the degree programme.
The Comprehensive Programme Framework is also intended to assist in addressing
the more general concerns that may arise in the course delivery, particularly
in those offered by interim-visiting instructors and course developers. It
recognizes that the richness of peace education is evident in its diversity
of practice and cultural perspectives, a diversity that at every opportunity
should be embraced in all aspects of the programme. At the same time, the framework
allows for the courses to complement each other in a holistic and conceptually
coherent fashion. (The “Comprehensive Programme and Course Planning Frameworks
for the University for Peace Masters Degree Programme in Peace Education: Guidelines
for Course Developers and Instructors (DEP/CPF/1.1)” is available upon
request)
United Nations Expert Study on Disarmament &
Non-Proliferation Education
(UN Department of Disarmament Affairs)
In 2000 the United Nations General Assembly requested the Secretary General to
prepare, with the assistance of a qualified group of governmental and non-governmental
experts, a study on disarmament and non-proliferation education. This initial
study was completed in 2002, and on October 9th of that year Dr. Betty Reardon
was featured as a key speaker at the United Nations to inaugurate the launching
of the study. Organized by the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs, it contains
a series of recommendations for immediate and long-term implementation to be
conducted, as appropriate, by Member States, the United Nations and other international
organizations, civil society, non-governmental organizations and the media.
The Secretary-General requested the preparation of a report reviewing the
results of the implementation of the recommendations to be submitted to the
General Assembly at its fifty-ninth session. Betty Reardon and Tony Jenkins
of the TCPEC have been involved in the follow-up to the study by participating
in inter-agency meetings, the first of which took place on June 25, 2003 at
the UN Headquarters. UN agencies, international organizations and NGOs representatives
participated in the meeting and shared their practices on the subject. The
TCPEC has been specifically involved in making recommendations toward the pedagogical
application of the recommendations made in the study, and defining the learning
objectives and social purposes of such pursuits (The United Nations Study on
Disarmament and Non-proliferation Education, and pursuant reports, can be found
online at: http://disarmament.un.org/education).
Consultation
designed and organized for
the
UN University
for Peace, Costa Rica
In the spring of 2002 the Center began consulting
with Dr. Abelardo Brenes of the United Nations affiliated University
for Peace in Costa on their development of a new MA program in
Peace Education. As an outcome of the initial consultation it was
decided that the Center would host an International Consultation
at Teachers College November 6-10, 2002. The consultation brought
together a group of experienced academics in peace education from
different regions in the world for their advice, including recommendations
on how to adapt the University of Peace program proposal to meet
the culturally specific needs of diverse regions. Participants
helped to clarify and integrate into the stated goals of the proposal
their views on the social purposes, learning goals and conceptual
frameworks around which the program should be built. In addition
to the consultative meeting a public forum was held with keynote
speakers including Dr. David Hamburg and Dr. Toh Swee-Hin, as well
as panels of UN and NGO agencies working in the field of peace
education.
The extensive
and complicated logistics of the event were coordinated by the Peace Education
Center with generous volunteer assistance provided by many of the students
in the peace education program. A copy of the final
report is available for download (in adobe .pdf format).
|